This website uses cookies

Read our Privacy policy and Terms of use for more information.

There are approximately 4,782 things you're suddenly supposed to know when you have a baby.

I'm estimating.

But it feels accurate.

How should they sleep? When do you introduce solids? Can they have water? Why does every perfectly normal-looking household object suddenly appear capable of injuring a tiny human?

And somewhere in that mountain of information comes one surprisingly specific rule:

No honey before the first birthday.

Not "limit honey."

Not "organic honey is okay."

Not "just a little."

No honey.

Which is interesting because honey isn't some strange new food additive. Humans have eaten it for thousands of years. Across cultures, we've cooked with it, preserved with it and used it in home remedies.

So what makes honey different when the person eating it is a baby?

It's not really about the honey

The concern is something honey can occasionally contain:

Clostridium botulinum spores.

These spores occur naturally in the environment, including soil and dust, and honey is one known source.

For older children and healthy adults, that's generally not a problem.

Babies are different.

Their intestinal environment is still developing. If a young baby swallows C. botulinum spores, the spores can sometimes germinate inside the intestines. The bacteria can then produce the toxin responsible for infant botulism.

That's the part I didn't understand until I actually looked into it.

With infant botulism, the concern isn't necessarily that there's already botulinum toxin sitting in your jar of honey.

The baby's intestines can provide an environment where swallowed spores grow and produce the toxin.

Suddenly, the rule makes much more sense.

So why 12 months?

There isn't a magical switch that flips at midnight on the baby's first birthday.

It's a safety boundary.

As babies grow, their digestive systems and intestinal microbiome develop and become much less hospitable to the bacteria responsible for infant botulism.

That's why public-health guidance uses a simple cutoff parents can actually follow:

No honey before 12 months.

And that means honey.

Not just raw honey.

Organic honey isn't exempt.

Local honey isn't exempt.

Manuka honey isn't exempt.

Honey from somebody's backyard hive isn't exempt.

And cooking it doesn't create a reliable loophole either because the spores themselves are highly resistant to heat.

So honey baked into foods should also be avoided for babies under one.

And then Grandma enters the chat

This is where it gets culturally interesting.

Honey has been considered soothing and nourishing in different traditions for generations. It's not hard to imagine how it ended up being given to babies too.

A little for a cough.

Something sweet on a pacifier.

Honey mixed into a home remedy.

Then a modern parent says the baby can't have honey and somebody inevitably responds:

"I gave it to all of you and you were fine."

And they probably did.

Infant botulism is rare. Plenty of babies were given honey and never became sick.

But rare isn't the same thing as impossible.

Once we learned that honey can be a preventable source of exposure to a potentially serious illness, the calculation changed.

Avoiding it for one year is pretty simple.

And I think that's an important distinction when we talk about traditional knowledge.

Changing a practice because we've learned something new doesn't mean our grandparents were foolish.

They couldn't see bacterial spores.

Neither can we.

We simply know something now that they didn't.

That's very different from dismissing an entire tradition because it isn't modern.

What if the baby accidentally eats some?

Don't panic.

Eating honey doesn't mean a baby will develop infant botulism. The recommendation is about avoiding an unnecessary risk.

But parents should know the warning signs.

Infant botulism can cause constipation, difficulty feeding, a weak cry, drooping eyelids, poor head control, unusual weakness or floppiness, and problems swallowing or breathing.

Those symptoms need medical attention, especially difficulty breathing, swallowing or feeding.

And if you're worried after an accidental exposure, call your child's healthcare provider rather than spending the next three hours terrifying yourself on Google.

We have all been there.

The honey didn't change

Then the first birthday arrives.

And honey can come back.

Same bees.

Same honey.

Same jar in the cupboard.

What changed was the child.

That's what makes this little food rule more interesting than it first appears.

Honey can be an ancient food.

A traditional remedy.

Something that can soothe coughs in older children.

And something babies under one shouldn't eat.

All of those things can be true at once.

Sometimes traditions change because we've abandoned something useful.

Sometimes they change because modern life changed.

And sometimes they change because we learned something the people before us couldn't have known.

Knowing the difference might be one of the most useful things we can carry forward.

Let's make sense of it.

Until next time,
Tami
Founder and Curious Editor
Roots & Rhythms

YOUR TURN

Was honey ever given to babies in your family or culture - for coughs, on a pacifier, in tea or for another reason?

Add your experience to the conversation—or hit reply if you would rather keep it between us. I read every response.

Keep reading
Explore more stories about how we eat, heal and live.

Was this forwarded to you?
Join Roots & Rhythms and get one thoughtful story each week.

Reply

Avatar

or to participate